luckynumbah7
JUB Addict
- Joined
 - Feb 5, 2008
 
- Posts
 - 8,814
 
- Reaction score
 - 119
 
- Points
 - 63
 
- Location
 - City
 
- Website
 - www.justusboys.com
 
The issue here is a Disney operated resort that attracts families, including children who are not anticipating alligators in their immediate vicinity when renting property, and using beach facilities provided by Disney.
It would have been bad for business had Disney erected a sign stating that their holiday resort was built in the middle of an alligator infested zone....evidenced by an alligator seizing a child.
Even assuming tourists complied with the no swimming sign, confining their beach activities to tanning...there was also the risk of an alligator exiting the water to seize its prey from tourists relaxing on the beach unaware that an alligator was approaching them with deadly intent.
The risk involves all of Florida, though. Disney isn't special. Unless there's a no swimming/alligator sign for the tourists on every streetcorner and Disney had no sign, then I'd be looking at Disney. I don't think I'd blame Disney for 'failing to inform' as I'd consider gators to be common knowlege - and one of the first things mentioned in conjuction with the word Florida in every conversation I can ever remember. Which is kinda funny, considering I rather loath Disney.
Tho if they were on every streetcorner (google tells me there's a lot of gator and no swimming sign variations) I'd be hard pressed to think they weren't informed Florida is for gators. This fall under one of those Common Knowledge things or not? Like knowing India has Cobras.

