Shouldn't the thread read "Trump accepts a call from the President of Taiwan"?
They called him, I believe, didn't they?
It does not work that way.
They already arranged what time should they talk to one another as leaders are busy.
To register, turn off your VPN; you can re-enable the VPN after registration. You must maintain an active email address on your account: disposable email addresses cannot be used to register.
Shouldn't the thread read "Trump accepts a call from the President of Taiwan"?
They called him, I believe, didn't they?
He does want to build a hotel in Taiwan lol----
China called him stupid and inexperienced so we should be nuking them by Jan 30.![]()
Shouldn't the thread read "Trump accepts a call from the President of Taiwan"?
They called him, I believe, didn't they?
They kind of bury that part of the story:
http://time.com/4589641/donald-trump-china-taiwan-call/
Trump’s call indicates that the President-elect is willing to shake up the status quo while also that he values America’s existing friendships. A Trump spokesman was quoted saying the President-elect was “well aware of what U.S. policy has been” on the Taiwan issue. And Trump seemed to indicate as such with a later tweet, which said: “Interesting how the U.S. sells Taiwan billions of dollars of military equipment but I should not accept a congratulatory call.”
And, of course, Trump just can't resist making a bad situation worse.
While his fart catchers were all over the place trying to clean up the mess over his call from Taiwan, he is busy adding fuel to the flames with twitter.
Jesus Christ.
This is not the way the President of the Untied States should be dealing with complex international issues.
You can't fight a twitter war with countries the way you do with Rosie O'Donnell.
He looks more and more like a reckless and dangerous buffoon.
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news...es-scrutiny-as-team-defends-taiwan-phone-call
Hillary supporters aren't Liberals. They are Liberals In Name Only.
""This call was no accident," said Trey McArver, analyst for China Politics Weekly. "It is clear that Trump associates, including chief of staff Reince Priebus, have had repeated contact with Tsai and her people in recent months and were well aware of what they were doing."
https://au.news.yahoo.com/world/a/33431568/chinese-media-offer-stern-warning-to-rookie-trump/#page1
^As a private American citizen Donald Trump can speak with whomever he wishes without having to kow tow to Beijing's dictator.
After assuming office as POTUS, Donald Trump's actions will be make interesting reading.
They choose their leaders often is not a "dictator".
It is just a different system, merit based system ?
Providing the candidates meet the criteria that selects those loyal to the party, there is no reason to believe that the candidates will provide the Chinese people with choices that they can vote on.
Tiananmen Square public dissent in favour of democratic governance is visibly disencouraged by China's ruling elite, with crushing consequences for those advocating selection of the government of China by the Chinese people, not by a privileged tiny elite.
Taiwan's government is elected by the will of its people evidencing that democracy works well on the island of Taiwan.
What you have said here has been my biggest frustration with my country's policy with China. We go around the world invading small countries to bring freedom and democracy and then suck up to Red China.
What you have said here has been my biggest frustration with my country's policy with China. We go around the world invading small countries to bring freedom and democracy and then suck up to Red China.
On reflection the United States plays it safe with China, and other totalitarian countries such as Saudi Arabia, for close trading relationships combined with an awareness that mutual distrust is harmful to the peace of the planet, can influence the growth of better relationships between nations.
Taiwan, and the United States are close military allies, with both countries prospering from a mutually beneficial trading relationship.
They choose their leaders often is not a "dictator".
It is just a different system, merit based system ?
If by "they" you mean the people, then no, they don't choose their leaders EVER.
The merit-based approach has its advantages, but Beijing's is not primarily a merit-based system but a loyalty-based system: if you're not loyal to the guy at the top, you're not going to advance unless everyone else is totally incompetent.
There, updated it for you.The merit-based approach has its advantages, but Beijing's AND THE U.S.A.'s is not primarily a merit-based system but a loyalty-based system: if you're not loyal to the guy at the top, you're not going to advance unless everyone else is totally incompetent.
